For and Against Climbing Mount Everest Using Bottled Oxygen

Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay in the year 1953he targets of without any oxygen because it shows
gave a ray of hope to thousands of otherhis capabilities and strength. Many people but not the
mountaineers who always dreamt of reaching themajority considers carrying bottled oxygen to be
summit of Mount Everest one day. They succeededunethical.
climbing Mount Everest by conquering andMountain climbing can be done keeping in mind two
overcoming all the obscurities and complexities thatapproaches, one is two give importance to the
arrived in their path. Their caches of supplementmedical parameters and the second one is to give
oxygen proved to be of great help in their entirewhole importance to the ethics. Medical parameters
route to the summit of Mount Everest. If they hadthat are necessary while climbing is to carry bottled
not been carrying those extra bottles of oxygen inoxygen but ethical approach is completely
their expedition, then maybe they could not havecontradictory to the medical approach. Ethics in
reached the summit. After their success peoplemountain climbing states that it is not right to use
considered that carrying superfluous oxygen in suchbottled oxygen while climbing high altitude mountains.
expeditions is mandatory for achieving success.The use of bottled oxygen has attracted many
But this mindset was challenged by two famouscontroversies over the years and still there is no final
mountaineers Peter Habeler and Reinhold Messnersolution or statement heard from those who are in
who reached the same summit without having anypower. On humanitarian grounds it is sensible to use it.
extra bottled oxygen. Their successful expedition toThere is absolutely nothing more important than life.
Mount Everest in 1978 proved to be the toughestSo why to put your life at stake? Even if you are
and the finest expedition to date. Ever since suchextremely passionate about climbing mountains and
two expeditions succeeded, one with oxygen bottlesreaching the summit of Mount Everest then you can
and one without any extra oxygen it triggered theonly make that happen if you are alive. Risking your
controversy of whether it is necessary to climb anylife and facing extreme conditions so high above the
high altitude mountain with the help from bottledsea level can prove disastrous. It is fine if we give
oxygen or not.importance to the ethics of the climbing world but it
The conditions that exist on the path towards thewill not be fair to risk a life for reaching any summit
summit of Mount Everest are very hostile. Oxygen iswhen it can be achieved without any risk to life.
available in traces and this makes conditionsBottled oxygen may or may not be the right thing
extremely difficult for humans to survive. As thefor mountaineers. But for life at such a high altitude,
height from the sea level increase the oxygen levelbottled oxygen is perfect.
decreases rapidly. As a mountaineer reaches moreThe debate on whether to use it or not will probably
and more height it becomes very difficult for him oralways be there. Different climbing societies have
her to breathe and chances on instant death risesdifferent perspectives. Some find it sensible to use
enormously. Considering the facts that we have justbottled oxygen and the other finds it sensible but
mentioned it is essential that every mountaineerunethical. These two ends never seem to meet and
carries bottled oxygen on his expedition to justthis difference in perspective and the definition of
heights. It is not only important for the success of'Ethics' will never be perfectly defined. The most
the expedition but is also crucial for his or her life. It isconvenient way at the moment is to let the
totally fair to support the use of bottled oxygen formountaineers and their respective groups decide
climbing Mount Everest and other high mountains. Nowhat is best for them. It should be left on them as
expedition should be given more importance than theto whether they want to use bottled oxygen for
life of the mountaineer.climbing or not. Both of them should respect the
There have been many cases in which people weredecision taken by the individual and should not
on the verge of dying because they were trying todisrespect or discard the approach used for reaching
climb Mount Everest without taking aid fromthe summit.
supplementary oxygen. One person who neverThis is the most appropriate method that can be
supported its use to such excursions was Georgeemployed for giving some relief to this never ending
Leigh Mallory. A member of the British 1921, 1922 andargument. Such discussions where to parties have
1924 Everest expeditions, he successfully reachedequal votes and equal strengths must be either
many great heights without the use of bottledconcluded or resolved like this. Reaching the summit
oxygen. George did change his mind on his secondof Mount Everest is a very big achievement.
summit attempt during the 1924 expedition and usedReaching the summit should be given importance
bottled oxygen for the first time, believing in the endbecause that is not a task that anyone can
that it may help him reach the summit. All those whoaccomplish. Whether a person reached there with or
still are against the use of bottled oxygen believewithout bottled oxygen are secondary considerations.
that a mountaineer should be able to reach the height